I believe that hunting is ethical as vast as you kill an animal for a basis not just for a good time. Like Ann Causey, I figure that if you command to hunt you should appreciate what you kill, and hunt for a reason to benefit you or other populate. Hunters and their families should be thankful for the viands they have after killing it. Ann Causey has a point that people should understand and follow what she says most hunting. More people in the world should be thankful and appreciate the things they kill sort of of hunt for no apparent reason.
Causey argues that hunting has the potential to be considered moral and ethical, as long as those who hunt boast a more humane attitude toward the animals they kill.
Also, she makes it quite exempt that hunting for sport and reducing an animal to nothing provided points and pounds is an activity that can never be argued as moral.
oer all, Causey does an excellent job looking at both sides of hunting. She understands the ratiocination and thoughts from both hunters and non-hunters. Her opinion consists of both arguments. The story lets the readers know how she feels thither is no problem with hunting, if the hunter has the correct understanding and thoughts about it. Instead of thinking about game just as an object to kill, Causey believes non-hunters would have a smaller problem if the animals were prize and the mindset of hunters had a deeper value. Whether its legal or not, the consciences and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment