Sandra Day O'Connor the American jurist

None of them had ever chartered a woman as an attorney and they were not virtually to break new ground in 1952. One of the firms which spurned her was Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, whose partners included William French Smith, later to be instrumental in her appointment to the Supreme Court.

Apparently she is still aware of the fact that women in the legality and other professions still struggle to sustain equal rights in the workplace. For example, although O'Connor acknowledged that women get to made round progress in rush related issues over the sometime(prenominal) 30 years in a recent rescue which she made, the Supreme Court Justice still does not accept that women are on equal footing with men in this area. In her speech, O'Connor cited statistics which showed that

while women represent as much as 30% of associates employed by a group of large law firms surveyed by The National police force Journal in 1984, only 5% of the partnership positions were occupied by women. [Moreover], [i]n Washington, few than 5 out of every 100 members of the 100th sexual relation are women. Fewer than 5% of the nation's judges are women.

This except shows that O'Connor wishes that women would hold to a greater extent professional positions in the field of law than they presently do, but, even today, O'Connor is careful to write her public opinions in a way that do not reflect her deep sitting personal commitment to women's issues in America.

Her personal commitment to women's issues in all likelihood stemmed from times when s

In 1991, O'Connor was given the opportunity to write a majority opinion in this area. In Gregory v. Ashcroft, she wrote the opinion for the Court upholding Missouri's mandatory retreat age of seventy for state judges. In her opinion, she said that the decree did not violate either the federal Age disagreement in Employment Act or the Equal bulwark Clause. She said that Congressional interference with the decision of the Missouri legislative assembly in "defining their constitutional officers ... would upset the usual proportion of federal and state powers."

Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).

Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).

notwithstanding O'Connor's personal beliefs about the way the Supreme Court has been fall to address key issues relating to reproductive rights, once again, O'Connor does not promote her support for women's issues onto the Supreme Court agenda. While she supports women's rights in general, she is excessively well aware of her heightened visibility in this area,. Thus, she has been very on the alert in her decisions and opinions. In fact, she has refused to take a hard placement on the abortion issue and her decisions are based more upon pragmatism than philosophy.

Wermiel, Stephen J. O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction. 13 Women's Rights Law Reporter 129 (1991).

Clark v. Jeter, 486 U.S. 456 (1988).

Gabor, Andrea. Einstein's Wife. New York: Viking, 1995.

As the first woman to have been appointed to the Supreme Court, O'Connor has drawn the most attention for signs of a feminist influence on the Court. Of course, by no means can she be described as a current feminist. Her background is strictly conservative and she first made a name for herself as a Republican state senator in a conservative state. However, she never followed the traditional family structure in her personal life. She raised three children while maintaining a career as an attorney and a judge. She may have followed her economise to Germany as a mil
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.