Evaluating Web Sites

With the advent of the World Wide Web and the huge descend of education that is contained there. Internet relatively is a relatively sunrise(prenominal) and there are a lot of untested information and communication medium. As such, we have to learn how to evaluate, expand and set existing criteria for evaluating them or even distinguish the ? devout? sack sites between them.

The following paper is the comparison of the weave sites that are different in content audience and purpose. The three vane sites I have been compared are Gender and human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS, The veritable Truth about Aids and The true But petty Known Facts about Women and Aids. Three of the weathervane sites act as the information area of the AIDS. The web sites need to be visually appealing, and information must be easily accessible if the web sites are going to be trusted. The evaluation of those three web sites will be based on their reliability, validity accuracy, fountainity, patness and bias. Evaluating web sites means determining whether or not they are ?good? and being trusted. I think that a good websites must have worthwhile content but sometimes there added additional goals or additional information on the specific websites, so we could get more information and it would be worth to trusted.

First website I have evaluated is Gender and HIV/AIDS; I can find out that the Ms. Nazneen Daji is the save one author or even the webmaster in this website. She mentioned that she is the schedule Specialist, Gender and HIV/AIDS, United National Development blood for the women. So I could probably think that the author is an practised in this field. The purpose in this web site is that the author has developed this compressive gender and HIV/AIDS as a web portal to provide up-to-date information on...

If you motivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.