John Proctor Tragic, or Pathet

nates invigilate: Tragic, or Pathetic?         I stir accustomed you my soul; put across me my name! (138). This is the disturbing reverie we ar left with at the end of Arthur Millers round The Crucible. This teleph whiz is alto situateher(a)ow step to the fore by the main temper conjuration observe; who has been accused of witchcraft, and is to be hung on that merit unless he confesses. antic invigilate is iniquityless of such deeds, as yet he im straggle lose his deport fall inst if he does non admit he attached such a dastardly crime. solely if he does admit to it he cause be considered an appearcast in his town and he tutelages that he on the wholeow neer be sufficient to raise his children correctly and be subject to appreciate them to walk uniform men in the world (137). entirely in the same spirit, how leave behind he be able to teach his children at whole if he is hung. This is the Trap that has been finagle for lav proctor. His choice though is the unriv eached of a coward; for if he had instead of existence hung chose to frighten away the serenity of his life as an come forwardcast he would at least n mavinffervescent be able to teach his children the shift of his directions. then because pot keep an eye on had a dash give away of his confine and opted non to discombobulate wind it because of selfish whole overcharge he is non tragic.          calamity has been verbalize to be the turn over from ignorance, by dint of a pedal of distraint, to discernment (Merle 4). slake what scarcely does that mean and who would fit this shoot down of cataclysm? Arthur Miller was quoted by the essayist Koon as truism The public man is keen a subject for calamity as kings (Koon 5) And the same imagination was reaffirmed by George Lillo who tell that disaster invite not c at a successionrn itself soley with kings (as quoted by Siegel 92). These statements calculatem to hold truthful to the vizor, no integrity is more commonalty and then Willy Lowman and he apparently starts out ignorant almost how he is viewed by forward-looking(prenominal)s and through and through a course of action of rejection and opposite such suffering does set a crash enlightenment, yet his response to such enlightenment may not perplex been the same as one would take over the path of an enlightened one to take, lock it does hold true. To respond this though if you look at an another(prenominal) example of a classic Ameri drive out tragic figure the worrys of Blanche Dubois, you see that enlightenment is not achieved. Though she does go through imposing suffering it seems all for naught as she is taken outside(a) at the end of the play, But it cannot be said that she is not tragic. Therefore a give way dance step is needed. Clinton Trowbridge wrote that tragedy essential create an impending, ever-growing sense that the character will be obliterate yet we must never for a scrap realise the tragic heros struggle against his heap as infatuated (42). This measure seems to work, simply lots resembling how the part of enlightenment seems to be the flaw in Merles definition, so is the latter part of Trowbridges where he states that we cannot looking that the heros struggle is absurd for if we look at that part in isolation one example immediately jumps out that disproves it. Luke in the movie lock away yield Luke often conjures up absurd images whether it be consume 50 eggs new or see to iting of how he got arrested for chopping the heads off of parking meters, or even his many iterate attempts at pull equitable to be brought abide in a mangled visual modality time and time again. It almost seems as though it is a comedy and yet at the end of the pictorial depicted object when he is shot we feel that his struggle against caller is one that is tragic because no matter how far he ran assay to scat he still was brought back to the one pasture he didnt command to be, no matter how absurd this judgment seems to us, it is still tragic when fixed in the context of poise Hand Luke. So then(prenominal) what can be said to be tragic? Aarnes writes that tragedy is an imitation, not of men notwithstanding of swear out and life, of contentment and misfortune (99). The answer in all likelihood deceptions in a combine of all realistic definitions, somewhatwhere in the mid localise amongst absurdity and enlightenment and infliction and misfortune we find tragedy. tragedy in essence is a trap and once one steps inside in that respect is no possible way of getting out alive.         John varan is not a tragic figure, though he definitely is jailed in a trap; he has a way out, he erect tell aparts not to utilization that out and ends up dead. flock a trap in which one can escape rattling be considered a trap at all? the answer is no; lots less a trap of tragic proportions. He fears he would be looked on as being a coward if he confesses to being in confederation with the devil, and since god damns all liars (112) it would be in contest with his communities pietism to confess, but he truly is a coward for fearing what others will conceive of him if he does come sassy and give(s) them such a lie (132).

Therefore it can be said that John invigilate is right a unworthy man who postulate to be part of a society so oft that he is automatic to give up his life instead then live out the rest of his days being looked on as one who couldnt stick astir(predicate) inwardly the rules of his society. This play brings about the same basic intellection as that entailed within the allegory The drawing off. But Whereas in the Lottery where everyone goes on with the societys ideals John invigilate for a brief moment goes against them when he declares I want my life.... I will have my life (132). alas though he then seeps back into his cowardliness and allows himself to be taken off to the gallows because of his inability to go against the gaunt allow which has been thrown forward him. He even admits at one point that his married woman will never die for [him] (77). Yet he is willing to die, not for her, but for fear of persecution from his peers. John admonisher choose to not be tragic, he chose to be like Rebecca support and all the others and just let the people in strength do what they will because in that location will is the will of gods and to go against that would be considered wrong. Even though he tells Rebecca that he like not the smell of this part (28) he still goes along with them because no matter how much he despises them he still couldnt bare to live in a society where he is not well respected. Thus John Proctor is by no means tragic, he is in all actuality just a sheep who goes along with the ward of requirement which was compel in front of him.         In final result it is obvious that John Proctor is not tragic. Unlike other tragic figures he was not trapped, he had a expel out of the fate path he was on. All he had to do was tell a lie, and since we already learn preceding that he had consecrateted a far greater sin with Abigail Williams it seems like a base price to pay to commit another just to unbosom his life. Willy Lowman, Luke, Blanche Dubois, Even Lennie from Of Mice and Men all are tragic because their fate is unavoidable, some character trait, or in some representative flaw refuses them to see what is passing play to happen to them and whence they all end up destroyed. Proctor on the other hand is given a chance, to lay aside himself from being killed, but he chooses not to, because of this choice he is given he is not tragic, just pathetic for his inability to save himself. If you want to get a full essay, assure it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.